ONRIGHTS
Lawyer reviewing a case file at their desk

Claim assessment

Determining whether your case can reach Strasbourg

We review whether you hold a final, unenforced ruling against a public body and assess the case's admissibility before the ECHR. We verify the exhaustion of domestic remedies, the applicable Convention rights, and the strategic viability of the claim before you commit resources.

Lawyer reviewing a case file at their desk

How it works

Four steps, and at each one you know what you provide and what we do.

You send us what you have

Invoices, contracts, rulings, correspondence: whatever there is. It does not need to be complete, because part of the work is telling you exactly what is missing.

We look at whether the claim holds

We check the nature of the debtor body, the state of the proceedings, which deadlines have passed and which are live, and whether any domestic remedy is still open.

We tell you where you stand

You get it in writing: whether the claim can be pursued, through which route, on what timeline, and what documents you need to gather before starting.

You decide

With the opinion in hand you decide whether to go on, and with whom. There is no obligation to continue with us, and the opinion is yours either way.

What the engagement covers

Point by point, what we take on.

What we review

  • Nature and solvency of the debtor body
  • State and finality of the proceedings
  • Deadlines passed and deadlines live
  • Documents available and documents missing

What you get

  • Written opinion on whether it can be pursued
  • Recommended procedural route
  • Estimated timeline by phase
  • List of documents to gather

What it does not cover

  • Filing of any submission
  • Representation before any court
  • Any commitment to continue

How we work

Six commitments that hold across all six engagements.

  1. We tell you no first

    If the claim cannot be pursued, you hear it before anything is signed. A file that cannot prosper is no use to anyone.

  2. A local lawyer in every country

    The domestic phase is run by someone who litigates in that forum every day. The European phase we run ourselves, because it is the same everywhere.

  3. The lawyer who briefs you is the one who runs it

    The file does not change hands when the meeting ends. Whoever receives you is who signs the submissions.

  4. The deadlines of the procedure, not estimates

    You get the dates the rules set, not an optimistic guess. When a deadline cannot be extended, we say so before we start.

  5. Everything in writing

    Each phase ends in a document you can take to your board: the opinion, the submission as filed, the ruling.

  6. Nothing you cannot check

    Every statement about case law comes with its judgment and its application number. You can verify it yourself on HUDOC.

Ready to Move Forward?

New ECHR rulings are holding States to account. Yours could be next.

Request a free evaluation